Celestia Forums

Diig ask: @gironde Is it possible to integrate the @Toutatis 3d model to the code you have put so, that the Philae module appears on the surface at those coordinates? yes, it is possible because the ESA has communicated the coordinates of the lander on 67P. It will be necessary to wait for the mode...

toutatis wrote:
so I can to deploy the feet of Philae probe which we have already...

Yes of course; you know your model.
I had one with my feet extended but 2 feet by 3 were also folded up and there were no antennas.

Toutatis, on the site, http://scifleet.esa.int/#/model-downloads, there is a model of Philae with the feet deployed (3ds files and tex for texture). It could be integrated into your timeline just before landing. Sans titre 2.jpg For those who would like to position Philae on the floor of 67P b: Begi...

SevenSpheres wrote: MrSpace43 wrote: gironde, those textures are outdated, and not in 8k, they're in 4k. Plus, we don't need that Ceres map since we already know what it looks like. The last post in this thread was over a year ago. Anyway, you can also look at Celestia Origin and Project TNO. I was...

For my part, I dropped the site https://www.lua.org/manual/5.1 because it is very difficult to learn a programming language in a foreign language. I found this: https://wxlua.developpez.com/tutoriels/lua/general/cours-complet/ It's in French. The replacement of table.getn () with # is noted in this ...

I also agree that the celestia loading screen should not systematically overwrite other Windows windows.

I also think that the log that can be displayed by: ~ [return] should be able to be edited in a txt file for easier processing.

LUT5 has been tested with celestia 1.6.1 and celestia EP V3 (1.7.0 5229 from the Russian Celestia website). The executables (32 bits) are mounted with LUA 5.1. The lua modules of LUT5 use the table statement: getn (your_table). Celestia 1.6.2 installer (32 / 64bit) is mounted in its beta version 1 w...

You must not be angry. We are just worried about the future of all existing scripts.

It should be known what was the Lua version originally implemented in celestia 1.6.1. The new debug versions for celestia 1.6.1 should only implement the same Lua version or at least Lua versions fully compatible with the original one. I mainly use Celestia Extended Pack V3 published a few years ago...

onetwothree wrote: Windows builds are available at Bintray and Github. The same installation file for both 64 and 32 bit versions. Known issues * "Disable display scaling on high DPI setting" must be set in windows with high DPI desktops * Lua 5.2 made "goto" a reserved word, sc...

onetwothree wrote: I will restore 5.1. But anyway I suggest start updating your scripts for 5.2 & 5.3 compatibility. That's what I did on my side. But even without LUT5 or lua-applications, the 64-bit celestia boot stops loading without an error message. Maybe it's due to too many addons. Yet u...

onetwothree wrote: Actually we use lua 5.3 in this build, basically because previous versions are not supported any more. From user's point of view, 5.3 handles numbers in more strict way and it has reserved word "goto". I will try to rebuild the next beta with LuaJIT which implements Lua...

I use Celestia EPV3 (derived from 1.6.1) mounted with lua v 5.1 (lua5.1.dll). When I use celestia 1.6.2 64bits, mounted with lua v5.2 (lua.dll), the start of celestia stops on an error due to an instruction lua which does not exist in lua 5.2 What is new 5.2 compared to 5.1? Is it really important ?...

onetwothree

You can just download it, edit it and send me.

here is the modified fr.po and fr.mo files :

I installed Celestia 1.6.2 beta 1 on Windows 10 64k by already having several versions of Celestia (1.6.1, EPV3). For now, everything seems to work, more quickly but there is no addon for now. The only concern noted is a problem in fonts. If you look in the picture below, you may find that the term ...

How is the coexistence of Celestia 1.6.2 Beta 1 and Celestia 1.6.1 in the Windows registry?

Here is the constellation of the many satellites Glonass GPS System (1982 to 2019). This is the system gps make by Roscosmos (URSS then Russia) :

Not having the 3D models of these satellites, I used Globalstar.3ds as generic (Celestia Motherlode).
The orbital data are on Norad-Satcat site. (2 lines)

There are 2 errors in the ssc file of Galileo GPS System.
Here is the correction.

Here is the constellation of 28 satellites Galileo System. This is the new system gps make by ESA: 1 Giove-A 1 Giove-B 4 Galileo-IOV 22 Galileo-FOV Not having the 3D models of these satellites, I used Globalstar.3ds as generic (Celestia Motherlode). The orbital data are on Norad-Satcat site. (2 lines)

There is also that which could be interesting.